Not pages to flip through, but a report you scroll into. Pick an example, then scroll down: the results appear one after the other, chapter by chapter, exactly the way the real report is built.
These examples were created without the reasoning test. Your Zukunftsprofil includes it.
The examples are illustrative. Names and details are changed, the structure of the report is always the same.
Your study and career orientation, from ten questionnaires
This report belongs to you. You decide who sees it.
Many statements carry a small word next to them. It tells you how sure we are.
Confirmed. Several things independently show the same thing. You can build on this.
Plausible. A clear signal, but one that still stands alone so far. Probably right.
Thin. We see a direction. It is not enough yet for a firm statement. Try it out.
You did not take a cognitive ability test. This report therefore says nothing about intelligence or aptitude. Everything here comes from what you have done so far, and from your own description of yourself.
Six areas you can work in. This is how strongly each one attracts you.
Five of six areas sit close together for you. The gap between them is small enough to mean nothing. For you that means: almost everything interests you, and none of it is a fluke. You can see that on the cover image too — your hexagon is round.
Social means working with people: accompanying, explaining, mediating. Enterprising means starting something yourself and winning others over for it. These two sit slightly ahead of the rest. The lead is small, but it points the same direction as your experience.
This means ordering work: administering, checking, working through fixed procedures. It is the only clear finding in your interest profile. A job made mostly of this would give you little in the long run.
Your three strongest areas together form a short code. Yours is looser than most people's, and that is an important piece of information in itself.
About seventy years ago, the American psychologist John L. Holland found that nearly all career interests trace back to six basic directions — the same six from the previous chapter. In English their initial letters spell RIASEC. This model sits inside almost every career test you will find today.
Practical, Investigative and Artistic score exactly the same for you. Which one shows up as the third letter is pure sorting chance. Your code could just as well be SEI or SEA. The gap between S and E is also small enough that we do not read into it. A career test that derives a firm direction from this would claim more than your answers actually support. We do not do that.
One thing is settled: your lowest score is in the ordering area, and it sits clearly below the rest. Your profile is open at the top and clear at the bottom. For your search that means you can rule out jobs with a heavy administrative share, and let the rest sort itself out through trying things.
Two services that let you look at the same question again from a different angle. Especially with a broad profile, a second look is worth it.
The open tool from the US Department of Labor. Shows you career fields that match each code.
Interests point in a direction. Your experience shows what has already held up.
We ask about five experience areas: practical, investigative, creative, social, and organizing. None is empty for you. In the creative and organizing areas you even have two entries each. That is rare, and it matches your broad interest profile exactly. You do not just talk about many areas — you have already been active in all of them. That is the best starting position for trying things out that this questionnaire can show.
You were specifically asked to come back. You received public positive feedback. And someone paid you for your work. This is the most important point in this chapter. What you say about yourself is, at first, just your own assessment. Once others independently confirm the same thing, it becomes evidence. For you, that happened three times, in three different ways. The deliberate re-request weighs especially heavily, because it means someone wanted your work a second time.
You led a group over an extended period and organized an event or initiative yourself. On top of that, you got something technically bigger up and running. And you wrote yourself what you are proud of.
Five traits describe how you approach tasks, people, and pressure. This is your own description of yourself. It shows rough directions.
You approach others and look for common ground rather than conflict. In groups that quickly makes you the person people turn to. This matches you regularly guiding others and being specifically asked to come back. In long projects you can easily end up taking on more than your share — that is the point worth keeping an eye on.
You plan before you start, and you follow through on what you set out to do. Your experience shows the same thing, since several entries ran over a longer period. This trait matters especially now — see “Where you stand right now.”
New ideas and unfamiliar paths appeal to you. Together with your broad interest profile, this explains well why the decision feels hard right now. A lot looks interesting, and that is tiring when you are supposed to commit. A path with options opening up in the second half suits you better than one that is narrow from the start.
Contact suits you, but you do not need it constantly. The value is too close to the middle for a clear statement. We hold back here.
Too close to the middle for a statement. How you are actually doing right now is covered in “Where you stand right now,” and we have better data for that than these four questions.
Three of five traits are clearly pronounced for you. For the other two we hold back. Four questions per trait give a rough direction. That is not enough for fine distinctions, and we would rather write nothing than make something up.
Values tell you which environment you will feel comfortable in long-term. They say nothing about your abilities. No value is better than another.
Universalism is your highest value, and Benevolence is also near the top. Together this means: it matters to you that what you do has an impact beyond yourself, and that the people around you are doing well. An environment whose purpose is limited to economic return tends, from experience, to carry you only briefly. This matches your strongest interest area and the fields in “Your Result.” Several sources point the same way here.
You want to decide for yourself what you work on. Self-Direction and Benevolence sit exactly level for you — there is no ranking between them. For choosing your path, that means in practical terms: pay attention to how much freedom of choice comes with it.
Status, influence, and enjoyment motivate you little — pleasure the least of all. If someone tries to sell you a path on earnings or prestige, it will barely land. Arguments about the content and the benefit to others reach you.
Your decision, your energy, and what helps you now. This chapter is the most important in the whole report for you.
Your energy has often been low in recent weeks, and a lot has felt exhausting. At the same time you say a conversation about your situation would help you. This is not a side note — it is the point where the most can shift for you right now.
That is how you described your own approach to the decision. In your situation that is easy to explain. You have a broad interest profile, you are open to new things, and your energy is currently low. These three together make weighing things easy and starting hard. Your conscientiousness from the previous chapter is on your side here — what you commit to, you follow through on. The bottleneck is starting, and small steps help against that.
You are still torn between several possibilities and have a rough idea, nothing fixed. For this phase that is the normal state, not a setback. There is time left until you finish school this year, and none of the next steps demands a commitment.
You are finishing your school-leaving exam this school year, your average is between 2.5 and 3.4, a move within the country would be possible, and you would need to largely support yourself financially. There are no other particular constraints. Financing is the one point that really changes your options. What follows from that is in “What you should still clarify.”
We compared your profile against sixteen fields of study. Five come out on top. They sit close enough together that we deliberately show them to you without a fixed order.
Working with people, lots of movement, lots of guiding. Sports science, training science, or sports management. At universities with an admission process that includes a practical component.
The field that best matches your values. Social Work at FH Campus Wien or FH JOANNEUM, Educational Science at the University of Vienna. Without a degree, a college for early childhood education would work.
You have regularly guided others and were specifically asked to come back for it. That is exactly the evidence this field asks for. Secondary level at the University of Vienna with the PH consortiums, primary level at the PHs. With an aptitude assessment.
Matches your creative track record, since you have published your own work and worked creatively over an extended period. Journalism at the University of Vienna, plus many media programs at universities of applied sciences.
Nursing, physiotherapy, or occupational therapy, mostly at universities of applied sciences. All with an admission process. Matches your values, and the paths there are short and close to practice.
For some profiles one field stands out. Not for you, and the reason is in the interest profile: five of your six interest areas sit almost level. A ranking built on that would be finer than the precision of this method allows and would fake a certainty that does not exist. What helps instead is trying things out.
There are still some years between you and a working life. These are directions to look at and try out, not predictions.
The field with the best evidence for you, because you have already done exactly this regularly.
Shows up because you have already organized an event or initiative yourself. As an immediate career goal it is not it, since you rated self-employment as unattractive yourself. As a skill you can use later, it is one of your evidenced strengths.
The career fields come from your interest profile. The individual roles inside them are examples that show you what such a field looks like day to day, not a calculation. Because your profile is broad, these four fields are also spread wider than usual.
Three points where your answers do not quite line up. The first one changes the most for you.
Five things, all kept deliberately small. Your energy has been low lately, so none of the steps costs a whole day's worth of energy. You do not have to commit on any of them.
You said yourself this would help you. A call or an email is enough to start. The addresses are in “Where you stand right now.” This step comes first because it is the only one that helps you with everything else.
One hour of research on pay, duration, and advancement options. Afterward you will know whether your exclusion was right. If so, you have one less worry. If not, you have one more path.
Any of the five from “Your Result.” A twenty-minute conversation shows you more about daily life than any description. And since you like guiding others, asking questions will likely come easily to you.
The university of applied sciences leads in your tendency, and you named closeness to practice as the reason. In person, you can see in two hours whether that impression holds.
With a broad profile, the selection is the actual step. Two is enough. You do not have to decide — you are only sorting the order in which you try things.
The full report as PDF, exactly as a student receives it.
Example reports. Names and details are changed.
This website uses technically necessary cookies and, subject to consent, cookies for statistical purposes. Consent may be withdrawn at any time. Privacy policy ·